Jung Kyung-ho stood in court as the defendant. In the 10th episode of the tvN weekend drama 'Pro Bono' aired on January 4th, Kang Da-wit (played by Jung Kyung-ho) was depicted confronting the pro bono team. On this day, Kang Da-wit appeared in court on charges of abuse of authority and illegal detention. The victim Yoo Jae-bum's (played by Yeon Je-yook) representatives are Park Ki-bbeum (played by So Ju-yeon), Jang Yeong-sil (played by Yoon Na-mu), Yoo Nan-hee (played by Seo Hye-won), and Hwang Jun-woo (played by Kang Hyeong-seok).

Standing alone in court without a lawyer, Kang Da-wit declared, "I am my own lawyer." When asked whether there was a conflict of interest, Kang Da-wit responded, "I already submitted my resignation before the trial. The level didn't match," and raised his voice, saying, "I'm too good to be on that team." The court then asked the prosecution, "Have you sufficiently verified the credibility of the complainant, who is a habitual fraudster?"

At this point, an additional representative for the victim appeared. That person was lawyer Song, the father-in-law of the presiding judge. Consequently, the judge changed the date of the trial. The next judge is Oh Jae-seop, who has a connection with Woo Myung-hoon. Kang Da-wit, who did not file a motion to disqualify the court, later appeared in a patient gown and in a wheelchair. Kang Da-wit said, "Isn't it strange not to be angry when I am wrongfully accused and betrayed by my team members?" and requested a postponement of the trial. When Judge Oh did not believe him, Kang Da-wit countered, "Didn't the chaebol chairman get good treatment?"

Hwang Jun-woo revealed materials that seemed to have been obtained with someone's help, claiming, "This case is personal revenge, not a trial." Yoo Nan-hee and Park Ki-bbeum began to suspect Hwang Jun-woo by pointing out that the employment application was an internal document of the court. Behind Hwang Jun-woo was Oh Gyu-jang (played by Kim Gap-soo). The newly appointed representative, lawyer Bae Yong-hoon, also took the pro bono team away from Oh Jeong-in (played by Lee Yoo-young).

Oh Jeong-in, who is facing conflict with her father Oh Gyu-jang due to the Elijah case, met with Kang Da-wit and expressed her anxiety, asking, "We can win, right?" This is because if Kang Da-wit finishes the case, there will be no place for Oh Jeong-in either. Kang Da-wit ominously remarked, "You're not asking what the truth is, are you?" After submitting her resignation to Oh Gyu-jang, Oh Jeong-in took on the role of Kang Da-wit's lawyer. She refuted the prosecution's statements one by one with the prosecutor at the time, Choi Dong-geun.

During this process, Park Ki-bbeum discovered that her role model judge, who once saved her parents, was Kang Da-wit. She conveyed this to Kang Da-wit, tearfully pleading, "Please, tell the truth. I want to believe in you, Lawyer Kang." However, Kang Da-wit replied, "I almost slipped past that," adding, "Where is the truth? There's only each person's perspective." He suggested that if she wanted to know the truth, she should win.

Later, Park Ki-bbeum pressured Kang Da-wit by mentioning the accident involving his mother. Kang Da-wit admitted, "It's true that I have a desire for revenge," and stated, "It's true that I'm a person unqualified to be a judge. I'm a sinner." This heightened the tension between Kang Da-wit and Park Ki-bbeum. Amid the complex situation involving the truth of the case and each person's stance, the atmosphere in the courtroom became even more serious.

Kang Da-wit clearly articulated his position through his statements in court. Standing alone without a lawyer, he strongly asserted his claims. The conflict between the court, the prosecution, and the victim's side was distinctly evident. Kang Da-wit's situation is intricately tangled, and the development of the case is expected to lead to fierce debates in court.

This case reflects a complex situation intertwined with personal emotions and elements of revenge, going beyond a simple legal dispute. Oh Jeong-in, who has taken on the role of Kang Da-wit's lawyer, is simultaneously confronting memories of the past and current conflicts. As a result, a fierce courtroom battle to uncover the truth of the case seems likely to continue.

Statements made in court and the submission of evidence are crucial factors in determining the direction of the case. The claims of Kang Da-wit and the victim's side are contradictory, and their perspectives on the case differ. This conflict is making the courtroom battles even more intense.

Ultimately, this case is unfolding at the intersection of personal revenge and legal justice. Kang Da-wit's statements and actions are significantly influencing the course of the case, and the tension in the courtroom continues to escalate. As the truth of the case is revealed, various interests are intertwined, and the interpretation of the case may vary depending on each person's perspective.

In such a situation, Kang Da-wit's choices and actions will have a significant impact on the direction of the case. The fierce battles in court are expected to continue, and it may take considerable time for the truth of the case to be revealed. Given the differing perspectives on the case, the courtroom disputes are likely to become even more intense.